Saturday, 17 March 2012

St Patrick and the New Atheist Snakes Besetting Britain

Victim of extreme atheists
A very Happy St Patrick's Day to all men of goodwill. I pray we may one day get a glorious saint like Patrick to evict all the "snakes" out of Wales and Britain...

We all know St Patrick was Welsh. In today's Daily Mail it is shamefully written that he came from England. This is the standard of education and journalism today! When Patrick was alive England hadn't yet been created. In a similar piece earlier this week another Mail writer asked if an Anglo Saxon burial from circa 600AD could be "Britain's first Christian."

I despair! I really do. Just as the whole Medieval glory of Welsh and English Catholicism (from the monastic glories of Strata Florida and Rievaulx to the 'lowliest' parish churches) are airbrushed from a history that focuses on the oath-breaker, regicide and murderess "Good Queen Bess" (sic), so the entire history of Welsh Catholicism and the Age of Saints in these Celtic lands are forgotten by a media that thinks Anglicanism --born in heresy and divorce and "flowering" today in homosexual bishops, untreadable goo and outright apostasy-- is the beginning and end of Christianity in these Isles.

Catholicism in Wales can trace its roots directly back to the time of the Diocletian Persecution and the Roman catacombs, the age of St Philomena, and earlier. Certainly by the 6th century Wales was a Christian land, the Mass and Sacraments received by all, and a hotbed of Monasticism.

If you are a journalist, a teacher, a pupil, a writer or just a bod like me: please remember that our Catholic heritage goes right back in these isles in  an unbreakable line to at least the third century and possibly even right back to Apostolic times.

The airbrushing of history seems to fit in with the Weltanschauung of the modern world in which a government says "we are going to have gay marriage whether you like it or not, but we will have a public consultation on how best to do it!" all lead by PM David Cameron who says he favours gay marriage: "because I am a Conservative." Furthermore the 'Equalities Minister' Lynne Featherstone calls anyone who opposes the oxymoron that is 'gay marriage' "homophobic" and wears a gay pride rainbow lapel badge.

Nice to know that this isn't already decided by Whitehall mandarins and MPs and we're all being steamrollered by a minority of a minority -- the influential "gay lobby."

St Patrick, St David, St George and St Andrew pray for us all! I fear these islands are being dragged downwards into a new dark ages that will make the savagery of the heathen Saxons look mild by comparison, especially as the new atheists have more sophistication, the media to ply their wares and the ability to gain influence in our very families. The very sophistication, eloquence and weasel words of the new atheists (apart from when the mask slips) makes them a worse enemy than the Saxon horde who desecrated Churches and whose misplaced loyalty to false gods was eventually overcome by the Catholic Faith.


If "gay marriage" is enacted (as seems humanly most likely), then it sets the gay lobby and the human rights lobby (backed by the courts especially in Europe) on a collision course with the Catholic Church. An immovable object and an irresistible force... If the court finds against the Church (in human rights lingo this is likely) then the Church, unable to back-down or give in becomes a law-breaker.

Fines, arrests, priests locked up, those who cave-in excommunicated, mobs demonstrating against "hateful" clerics... it all has the smack of the Reformation, or to use a more recent example the (atheistic) Communist repression of the Church. Might the new atheists follow in the footsteps of the old ones? Hardy times call for hardy souls.

But first we need to campaign against the idea of gay marriage (start by spreading the petition against gay marriage) and pray like never before! Might I suggest a special devotion to the Blessed Sacrament? Some time spent in prayer before and after Communion in thanksgiving. Some preparation for Mass? It really is the very least we can do.

4 comments:

  1. "We all know St Patrick was Welsh."

    I have already asked Fr Erlenbush of the New Theological Movement blog the basis of his assertion that St Patrick was born in Scotland. He points to Butler and to the Catholic Encyclopaedia but then claims he was a Briton. (Don't laugh -I once met an American who thought Wales was Scotland!) As far as I am aware the Roman province of Britannia did not extend beyond Northumbria and, during the period in question, "Wales" and "England" were simply "Britain". If you have evidence of a Welsh birthplace I should be very interested.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Strathclyde was a Welsh Kingdom (known in Welsh as the Men of the North). Glasgow is Welsh and means "Blue Field" - i.e. good grazing. The name Wallace [as in William Wallace] literally means Welshmen. There WERE Welsh [Britons] north of Hadrain's wall, as well as the Picts further north.

      The Welsh in Scotland eventually lost their kingdom after pressure from the Picts/Highlanders, but mostly from the Irish known as the Scots (but this wasn't until 4-500 years after St Patrick). But Welsh people obviously lived there still, and there is evidence for a gradual and peaceful take-over with inter-marrying etc. - as well as rivalry and battles.

      So if he came from Southern Scotland, the borders or the Central Belt, from Cumbria, Lancs, Wales, Cornwall or Devon: St Patrick was Welsh.

      At the time of St Patrick the Saxons hadn't taken all of England (England per se did not exist) and the Scots were still in Ireland (Scotland per se did not exist). Most of Britain were Brythonic Celtic (Welsh) kingdoms bar the Scottish highlands and Saxon/Danish kingdoms from settlements and invasions.

      The fact of Patrick's Welshness is widely accepted by historians.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for this information. So even if he did come from Scotland, he was Welsh!

      Diolch yn fawr!

      Delete
    3. Basically... yes.

      Because at the time Scotland and England were yet to exist. Most of Britain consisted of Welsh 'kingdoms.'

      Dim problwm. ;-)

      Delete